PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH THE PARLIAMENTARY MODEL

Penulis

  • Jona Bungaran Basuki Sinaga Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN)
  • Melyana R Pugu Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Al-Amin Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Kata Kunci:

System, Presidential Government, Indonesia.

Abstrak

The government in Indonesia follows a presidential system that provides high executive stability. Elections are used to directly elect the nation's leaders and administration, ensuring consistency in national policy. However, political coalitions between the executive and legislative branches often lead to conflict especially when the two branches come from conflicting political parties. This can bring down the order of government. In contrast, the parliamentary model tends to prioritize harmony because the executive is elected from among the parliament and the two parties are always in line. However, Indonesia has devised a number of mechanisms that can minimize the shortcomings of the presidential model. The government coalition system and the checks and balances mechanism have effectively balanced the relationship between the branches of state. Constitutional provisions and regulations that are responsive to political dynamics also allow the presidential system to continue to adapt to various changes. Thanks to these efforts, the stability of governance in Indonesia has been maintained despite the challenges faced. In general, despite the fundamental differences between presidential and parliamentary systems, Indonesia has been able to effectively implement the presidential system through various adjustments in accordance with its socio-political context.

Referensi

Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Qualitative Research Methods of Literature Study. Edumaspul: Journal of Education, 6(1), 974-980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394

An, Y. H. (2023). Globalization, Presidential Electoral System, and Income Inequality. Journal of Parliamentary Research, 18(1), 67-101. https://doi.org/10.18808/jopr.2023.1.3

Arabaev, R., Berenalieva, A., & Mazhitov, B. (2021). MODERN KYRGYZSTAN: FROM PARLIAMENTARY REPUBLIC TO PRESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT. THE BULLETIN, 5(393), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.32014/2021.2518-1467.178

Bergmann, H., Bäck, H., & Saalfeld, T. (2023). Party-system polarization, legislative institutions and cabinet survival in 28 parliamentary democracies, 1945-2019. Parliaments and Government Termination, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 157-182. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003397168-8

Bingöl, Y. (2024). THE NEW PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM OF TÜRKİYE: A SAMPLE MODEL FOR STABLE AND EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT? Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.58640/asyar.1484013

Bowler, S., Farrell, D. M., & Katz, R. S. (2020). PARTY DISCIPLINE AND PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT. Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv177tghd

Bromo, F. (2024). Government-initiated Votes of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies. Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yrx7q

Cheibub, J. A., Martin, S., & Rasch, B. E. (2023). Government Selection and Executive Powers: Constitutional Design in Parliamentary Democracies. Parliaments and Government Termination, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 208-235. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003397168-10

Dios, M. S. de. (2020). Parliamentary Party Discipline in Spain. PARTY DISCIPLINE AND PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv177tghd.13

EKMEKÇİ, M. (2022). Cumhurbaşkanlığı Hükümet Sisteminin Cumhurbaşkanlığı İdari Teşkilatına Etkileri. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 21(3), 1283-1301. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1100830

ELİTOK, M. Y., & DEĞİRMENCİ, F. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Government Systems (Parliamentary System-Presidential System). Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, 27(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.5152/jssi.2023.23472

Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2020). 11. Parliamentary Scrutiny of Central Government. Public Law, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 418-486. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198836742.003.0011

Fagbadebo, O. (2020). From Parliamentary to Presidentialism: Different Governing Systems and Practices with Similar Outcomes. Impeachment in the Nigerian Presidential System, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 381-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6041-5_8

Fajar, N. M. A. P. (2023). PRESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEM STRENGTHENING THROUGH A PARTY SYSTEM SIMPLIFICATION (A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE INDONESIAN PARTY SYSTEM AND THE UNITED STATES PARTY SYSTEM). UNTAG Law Review, 7(2), 116-116. https://doi.org/10.56444/ulrev.v7i2.4600

Faragher, C. (2021). 5. Parliamentary government and the legislative process. Public Law Concentrate, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 54-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192897251.003.0005

Fasone, C. (2023). A Distinct Role for Parliamentary Administrations in Presidential and Parliamentary Systems? The Routledge Handbook of Parliamentary Administrations, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181521-3

Ginsberg, B. (2020). Presidential Government. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300220735

Gunich, S. V. (2022). On the issue of the formation of a parliamentary-presidential republic in Russia. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 5, 153-153. https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520012518-0

Jadhav, A. (2023). Parliamentary vs. Presidential Democracy: Does it Make Difference at the Local Level Economic Development? Evidence from India. SSRN Electronic Journal, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4321225

Jiang, J., Renstrom, T. I., & Marsiliani, L. (2023). Political Equilibrium and Higher Education Spending in Presidential and Parliamentary Regimes. Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4609189

Joseph-Barthélemy. (2020). Ministers and Parliamentary Government. The Government of France, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290909-7

Kandel, P. (2023). PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN MONTENEGRO. Scientific and Analytical Herald of IE RAS, 33(3), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran320235664

KARAER, A. (2021). PARLAMENTER VE BAŞKANLIK SİSTEMLERİNDE YASAMANIN BÜTÇE GÜCÜ. Sayıştay Dergisi, 32(122), 73-105. https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1004569

Khan, A., Habib, Dr. R. I., & Akhtar, Dr. N. (2022). A Comparative Study of Parliamentary & Presidential Systems of Government: Economic Implications for Pakistan. Journal of Economics, Management & Business Administration, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.59075/jemba.v1i1.60

Kokashvili, N., & Shin, Y. (2020). How political ideology of government affects health system efficiency. Evidence from parliamentary democracies. International Journal of Public Policy, 15(5), 380-380. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpp.2020.113717

Makita, J. (2022). Development of Legislative Supporting Agencies (LSAs) from a Perspective of Difference between Presidential and Parliamentary Systems. SSRN Electronic Journal, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4057911

MH, E. (2022). EXTENSION OF THE PRESIDENTIAL TERM AND EFFORTS TO STRENGTHEN THE POST-COVID 19 PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM. AL WASATH Journal of Legal Science, 3(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v3i1.329

Mimica, N., Navia, P., & Cárcamo, I. (2023). Party Affiliation, District-Level Incentives and the Use of Parliamentary Questions in Chile's Presidential Democracy. Government and Opposition, 59(2), 526-542. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.7

Mitchell, J., & Williamson, C. (2022). Choreography of Defeat: The Fall of the 1979 Government. Parliamentary History, 41(2), 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12633

NACAK, O. (2020). PARLAMENTER VE CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI HÜKÜMET SİSTEMLERİNDEN HAREKETLE BAKAN VE BAKANLIKLARIN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(1), 138-157. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.678462

Nikolenyi, C. (2023). Government termination and anti-defection laws in parliamentary democracies. Parliaments and Government Termination, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 183-207. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003397168-9

Osadchuk, I. Y. (2020). Governmental cabinets in the context of functioning of the atypical parliamentary system of government in the state of Israel (1996-2003). Politicus, 2, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-9616-2020-2-75-82

Ovsepyan, Z. (2022). Modi cations of the Presidential-Parliamentary Form of Government in the Russian Federation (Based on the Analysis of the Novelties of the Law on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation 2020). Rossijskoe Pravo. Obrazovanie, Praktika, Nauka, 6, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.34076/2410_2709_2022_6_19

Palonen, K. (2024). At the Origins of Parliamentary Europe. Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18255583

Popović, D. (2021). Parliamentary Government. Constitutional History of Serbia, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783657791026_004

Raco, J. (2018). Qualitative research methods: Types, characteristics and advantages. Query date: 2024-05-25 20:59:55. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mfzuj

Rannie, M., Saraswati, R., & Wisnaeni, F. (2024). Does the Reform of the Parliamentary and Presidential Threshold Strengthen the Presidential System in Indonesia? Sriwijaya Law Review, 8(1), 133-133. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.3157.pp133-151

Rasch, B. E. (2020). Electoral Systems, Parliamentary Committees, and Party Discipline: PARTY DISCIPLINE AND PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 121-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv177tghd.12

Rozenberg, O. (2022). Minority Governments in France. Minority Governments in Comparative Perspective, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 170-188. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192871657.003.0009

Rupar, M., Sekerdej, M., Jamróz-Dolińska, K., & Hubená, B. (2024). Constructive patriotism predicts voting intentions: Evidence from state parliamentary, EU parliamentary, and presidential elections across different EU countries. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 12(1), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.9609

Shin, Y., & Kokashvili, N. (2020). How political ideology of government affects health system efficiency. Evidence from parliamentary democracies. International Journal of Public Policy, 15(5), 380-380. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpp.2020.10036309

Suciyati, P. H., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2023). Constitutional History During the Parliamentary System of Government: Ris to Presidential Decree (1949-1959). HISTORIA: Journal of History Education Study Program, 12(1), 23-23. https://doi.org/10.24127/hj.v12i1.7913

Sugiyono. (2010). Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Alfabeta.

Susilowati, W. M. H. (2024). APPLICATION OF FAST-TRACK LEGISLATION METHOD IN PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA. Cepalo, 8(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v8no1.3346

Thompson, L. (2020). From Minority Government to Parliamentary Stalemate: Why Election 2019 was Needed to Break the Brexit Logjam. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa038

Ward, W. E. F. (2023). Presidential and Cabinet Government. Government in West Africa, Query date: 2024-08-18 07:26:38, 108-120. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003361954-9

Zainul. (2022). Political Implication of Presidential System Practice in The Jokowi-JK Government. British Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and History, 2(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjpsh.2022.2.1.2

Zaznaev, O., & Sidorov, V. (2020). Presidential or parliamentary system: What hinds an ethnic conflict. Political Science (RU), 4, 290-308. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.04.14

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-08-18

Terbitan

Bagian

##section.default.title##