EVALUATION OF RESEARCH GRANT PROGRAMS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STAKE MODEL

Authors

  • Eliagus Telaumbanua Universitas Nias, Indonesia
  • Peringatan Harefa Universitas Nias, Indonesia
  • Yulian Purnama UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Maulana Arafat Lubis Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia
  • Nashran Azizan Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia

Keywords:

Program Evaluation, research grants, LPPM, Stakr mode

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the planning, implementation and results of the research grant program of the Research and Community Service Institute at the Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas Islamic Institute. The research method used is a qualitative research method, ethnographic research type, a Stake model program evaluation approach with stages of antecedents, transactions and outcomes. The research subjects were the Head of LPPM, Head of the LPPM Research Center and Grant Participants. Data collection was carried out through interviews, observation and documentation studies. The data analysis techniques used by the Miles and Hubermen model are: data collection, data reduction, data display and conclusions. The research results showed that: 1. The number of participants who took part increased by 50% and the number of participants who passed increased by 250%. It was found that there was still a lack of participation from lecturers and the number of research grant quotas provided by LPPM had not been fulfilled. 2. Program implementation has been 71.43% complete. It was found that each program activity did not comply with the predetermined schedule. 3. Research results in the form of reports and article publications have only reached 28.57%, the other participants have not completed the research with the time allowance of 4 months. 4. There is contingency between input, implementation and results. Because the number of participants who registered did not meet the quota, additional time was given, so the implementation of research activities also experienced a shift so that the research results were completed far from the target time with a gap of 4 months. Overall, the Research Grant Program is very necessary, continued and improved from aspects that are considered dominant.

References

Adnyana, I Ketut Widhi Wirawan, Y. H. (2020). Teknik Perancangan Arsitektur Knowledge Management System (KMS). Majalah Ilmiah Unikom, 17(2), 103–110.

Agustino, R. (2020). Sistem Informasi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat. Jurnal Jaring Saintek, 2(1), 1–12. http://ejurnal.ubharajaya.ac.id/index.php/jaring-saintek/article/view/61

Ambiyar, M & Muharika D, SST, M. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Evaluasi Program. In Penerbit Alfabeta Bandung. Alfabeta.

Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar evaluasi program pendidikan. In Perdana Publishing (Vol. 53, Issue 9). Perdana Publishing.

Imam Gunawan. (2011). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1, 1–13.

Lukum, A. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Ipa Smp Menggunakan Model Countenance Stake. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4552

Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model Evaluasi Program dalam Penelitian Evaluasi. Occupational Medicine, 53(4), 130. http://ejournal.utp.ac.id/index.php/JIP/article/view/538

Nasrullah. (2019). Pedoman Penelitian Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP2M) Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas.

Penelitian, L. (2018). PEDOMAN PELAKSANAAN Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat LEMBAGA.

Puspayanti, A. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Diklat Menggunakan Model Countenance Stake. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 6(1), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v6i1.52

Sugiono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta.

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2013). EVALUASI PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN (Instructional Program Evaluation). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v5i1.1266

Downloads

Published

2024-02-08

How to Cite

Eliagus Telaumbanua, Peringatan Harefa, Yulian Purnama, Maulana Arafat Lubis, & Nashran Azizan. (2024). EVALUATION OF RESEARCH GRANT PROGRAMS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STAKE MODEL. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY DEDICATION, 4(1), 256–272. Retrieved from https://adisampublisher.org/index.php/pkm/article/view/665

Issue

Section

Articles